Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  -  Click Here

EXPLORE Act Pilot Projects Will Count OHV and Dispersed Recreation, Help Shape How It’s Counted by July 29

A new federal recreation monitoring program under the EXPLORE Act will decide how OHV riding, dispersed camping, and snowmobiling get counted on public lands. BRC supports better data but is telling the agencies that visitation counts must never become a standalone excuse for closures or permit systems. Submit your comment before the July 29 deadline.

Camper van forest
Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

July 27, 2026

The federal agencies responsible for managing America's public lands are asking for public input on a new recreation monitoring program required by the EXPLORE Act, and the results could influence future recreation planning and management decisions across the country. Comments are due July 29, 2026.

What Section 133 of the EXPLORE Act Requires

Section 133 of the Expanding Public Lands Outdoor Recreation Experiences (EXPLORE) Act directs the Department of the Interior, U.S. Forest Service, NOAA, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to develop pilot projects that better measure recreation use on public lands. The agencies are proposing pilot protocols at a minimum of ten land management units for each participating agency to collect information on recreation use patterns, with a particular focus on activities that have traditionally been difficult to measure, including dispersed recreation and low-use activities.

Why Dispersed and Motorized Recreation Have Been Undercounted

For years, many public land decisions have relied on incomplete visitation data. Activities such as off-highway vehicle riding, dispersed camping, snowmobiling, hunting, and other forms of dispersed recreation often occur away from developed trailheads and visitor centers, making them difficult to capture through traditional counting methods. When recreation use is underestimated, it can lead to management decisions that fail to recognize how important these activities are to local communities, rural economies, and the millions of Americans who depend on access to public lands.

How the Agencies Plan to Measure Recreation Use

The agencies are proposing to use a combination of traditional monitoring methods, including trail counters, visitor logs, permit information, and on-site observations, along with newer technologies such as anonymized location data, publicly shared recreation information, and aerial or satellite imagery to better understand how recreation occurs across the landscape. According to the agencies, the goal is to develop more accurate recreation data that can be used to improve planning, visitor services, and long-term management decisions.

Where BlueRibbon Coalition Stands on Recreation Monitoring

BlueRibbon Coalition supports the development of more accurate recreation monitoring methods under Section 133 of the EXPLORE Act. For too long, dispersed recreation, motorized recreation, and other forms of outdoor recreation have been underrepresented in agency visitation estimates, leading to management decisions that often fail to reflect how Americans actually use their public lands. However, the monitoring framework should be designed to improve recreation management and public access, not to create a new mechanism for restricting it.

Visitation Data Should Not Justify Closures or Permit Systems

Visitation data alone should never be used as a standalone justification for closures, permit systems, or other access restrictions. Any future management actions should continue to rely on site-specific analysis demonstrating actual resource impacts, public safety concerns, or other statutory requirements rather than simply the popularity of an area.

Pilot Projects Should Measure the Full Value of Recreation

The agencies should also ensure the pilot projects measure the full value of outdoor recreation, including dispersed and motorized recreation, economic contributions to local communities, volunteer stewardship, and unmet demand for recreation infrastructure such as trailheads, staging areas, parking, and campsites. Recreation monitoring should identify opportunities to invest in and improve access before considering restrictions.

Methods Should Be Transparent and Open to Public Review

The methodologies used in these pilot projects should be transparent, scientifically validated, and subject to public review so stakeholders can have confidence that future management decisions are based on accurate, balanced, and objective information.

Comment Before the July 29, 2026 Deadline

This comment period is an opportunity to help ensure these pilot projects accurately capture the full spectrum of recreation occurring on our public lands. Better data today can help lead to better access decisions tomorrow. Comments are due July 29, 2026!

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Categories