Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  -  Click Here

Ashley National Forest Revised Management Plan

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

January 12, 2022

The Ashley National Forest located primarily in Utah but partially in Wyoming has not updated their management plan since 1986. The USFS has released the draft Environmental Impact Statement and the draft is open for public comment. This is the second stage in the whole management plan process. The forest already contains the High Uintas Wilderness Area. One concern that BlueRibbon always has is "buffer zones" to the wilderness which is a way for land agencies to launder wilderness protections where wilderness hasn't been formally designated. You can see below the three proposed alternatives, yellow is general recreation. Alternative C is the most restrictive with Alternative D being the most sympathetic to recreation users. With that said, there is still more that Alternative D could be doing to provide continued access for the public.

The plan will affect both land and waters because the Green River and Flaming Gorge are within the Ashley. There is a push for more restricted access along the Green River south of the Ashley NF and you can learn more about that here. Although this part of the planning process won't close or restrict anything site-specific it will create Recreation Opportunity Spectrum areas which will potentially limit roads and motorized use. If those areas are created then travel management that will happen later will close all routes and trails within the non-motorized areas both for summer and winter recreation.

You can read the Draft Environmental Impact Statement as well as the proposed plan and alternatives on the Forest Service website here.

The Forest Service will be holding two meetings before the comment deadline. One on January 19th 12:30-1:30 MST you can join here. This one is focused on recreation, wilderness and wild and scenic rivers.

The second will be January 25th, 12:30-1:30 MST. You can join here. This meeting is focused on active management and grazing.

BlueRibbon will be engaged on these meetings and will continue to update our members as we learn more about the plan.

Our work to protect access to snowmobiles on our national forests is generously supported by the SkiDoo P.A.S.S. program. Our field work, policy analysis, and public outreach on this planning effort was supported by a SkiDoo P.A.S.S Grant.
Our work to protect access to snowmobiles on our national forests is generously supported by the International Snowmobile Manufacturers Association.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Categories