Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  –  Click Here

Oppose New Areas of Critical Environmental Concern in Bears Ears National Monument

May 26, 2024

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Bears Ears National Monument in southeast Utah is updating the resource management plan, the overarching plan that will direct the future of the monument for decades. This plan will show which areas are off limits to certain users including mining, recreation, grazing, camping, hiking, target shooting, and wood gathering among others. The Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service have given 5 alternatives of management options that have different degrees and areas of restrictions and closures.

A tool that is becoming more and more common that these agencies are using to restrict use is the designation of Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, also known as ACEC’s. ACEC designations in Bears Ears could lead to restrictions on over 1 million acres. Help us oppose these designations.

Historically, these designations have been used as justifications to close roads even though the BLM has previously said that roads can still be allowed within an ACEC. Recently the BLM published the new Conservation and Landscape Health rule which would prioritize designating ACEC’s on public lands however this rule was not finalized before they released the draft proposals for Bears Ears. A new type of ACEC designation is being proposed in Bears Ears though, an Aquatic ACEC. John’s Canyon and the Aquifer Protection ACEC are the ACEC’s that have been nominated, not yet designated. Alternative D and E as you can see below would designate the ACEC’s, and the table shows how much acreage would be included. Alternative E is the agencies preferred alternative.

John’s Canyon north of San Juan River, includes Cedar Mesa and Grand Gulch. Recreation and other uses would be limited.

The water within Bears Ears is already protected under numerous laws and acts such as the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Clean Water Act and NEPA. Designating over a million acres as an ACEC is unjustified and will be used to justify more and more closures and restrictions.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen a familiar coordinated push claiming that congressional action on the Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument (GSENM) management plan would be “undemocratic” and lead to “chaos.” This is the kind of push that usually feels more...

Categories