Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  –  Click Here

Help Us Fight for Fish Lake Trail in Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forest OHV and Travel Planning

Sep 15, 2023

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

The Nez Perce and Clearwater National Forests are undergoing supplemental travel management. The travel management planning is a result of a court decision from 2022. Friends of the Clearwater sued over the decision to allow motorized use on certain trails, specifically the Fish Lake Trail. The plan also analyzes in more detail elk habitat. Creating Elk Habitat could restrict motorized use further. Comments will be accepted through October 2, 2023.

This plan has a long history of litigation over restricting use within the forests. For nearly 15 years this planning has been scrutinized. The Idaho State Snowmobile Association (ISSA) along with BlueRibbon also challenged the 2011 travel management decision. The ISSA/BRC lawsuit resulted in a settlement agreement that required the Forest Service to analyze again the decision regarding travel management in four Recommended Wilderness Area (RWAs). BRC and ISSA challenged the decision of the RWA’s and the removal of motorized use within areas that have historically been open motorized users. It was deemed in court that motorized use in these areas would be prohibited however, the Fish Lake Trail could allow motorized use. The Fish Lake Trail has a long history of motorized use. The Friends of the Clearwater sued that the Fish Lake Trail should also be closed to motorized users.

1987 Forest Plan is when the RWA’s were first recommended. They have never been congressionally designated. Fish Lake Trail is the only motorized route to access Fish Lake. This trail needs to stay open to motorized use. While the planning process is ongoing, the route is currently prohibited to motorized. Let the USFS know by sending in a comment that these RWAs and Fish Lake Trail should not restrict uses that have been happening long before the Forest Service was created.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen a familiar coordinated push claiming that congressional action on the Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument (GSENM) management plan would be “undemocratic” and lead to “chaos.” This is the kind of push that usually feels more...

Categories