Enter to win custom GasGas Dirt Bike + Moab Trip! Click Here

Grandview Travel Management Plan: Input needed on proposal to close 65% of routes in Idaho area

Mar 11, 2024

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Update Deadline Extended until April 15,2024

The Owyhee region of southwestern Idaho is accepting public comment for their final travel management plan of the area. The Grandview travel area hosts 1,365 miles of open OHV routes year round along with one backcountry airstrip. These routes give way to numerous permitted motorcycle races throughout the year. The planning area encompasses 251,000 acres, and because it’s only a 90 minute drive from Boise, it is a popular area for all kinds of OHV interests including river access to the Snake River. Please submit a comment below to the BLM in order to make your voice heard. If you have additional insight to this area, include that at the beginning of the comment. Comment will be accepted until April 15, 2024.

Full Briefing

In all alternatives the airstrip is closed other than Alternative A which is the current alternative. The BLM should be analyzing keeping this airstrip open for backcountry pilots.

The plan states that it will follow Secretarial Order 337 which states e-bikes will be permitted where bicycles are allowed in order to accommodate those with physical limitations. However, the plan is classifying e-bikes as an OHV and will not be permitted on non-motorized routes. This discrepancy needs to be fixed.

Alternative B is the most restrictive with Alternative D proposing the least amount of closures. Under Alternative D 554 miles of routes will be closed and 587 miles will be closed for use of motorcycle races. Closing more than 40% of routes in one travel area is unacceptable. There’s currently 183 acres for every one mile of routes. However with the most restrictive alternative, there will be 1,123 acres of planning area for one mile of open OHV year round routes. Alternative B simply doesn’t provide enough public access to our public lands.

Sedimentation, nesting, stream crossings, and the prevention of the spread of noxious weeds and invasive species causing, “adverse impacts to wildlife habitats and biodiversity” are the primary reasons listed for closures. When you submit your comments, we encourage you to customize your comments to address how these concerns can be mitigated on your favorite routes.

Bureau of Land Management must use best available information when making these decisions. Most of the data regarding nesting that is being used to justify route closures are old and do not show a current present threat, “Because no systematic surveys have occurred, motorized use of routes and airstrips could cause continued disturbances to this species if they are present, but these effects cannot be quantified.” BRC advocates that the BLM should not close economic and recreational resources simply because environmental groups are pushing for closure. Closure is not management. Please review the maps below to see which routes are being considered for closure and include those areas into your comment.

Maps – Interactive map can be Viewed Here: https://blm-egis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=728e71b8679444d489562e48ccbfd357

Featured image on this post provided courtesy of Trails Off Road. BRC members and supporters can get 40% off Trails Off Road using this link, and Trails Off Road will donate a portion of the subscription back to our fight to keep trails open.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
12 Days of Legal Updates: Our Lawsuit to Save the San Rafael Swell

12 Days of Legal Updates: Our Lawsuit to Save the San Rafael Swell

On December 31, 2024, just as the sun was setting on the final hours of the Biden administration, the BLM released a new Travel Management Plan for the San Rafael Swell. For generations, the Swell had been a place where families, explorers, and motorized...

Categories