Breakthrough: Historic Roadways Protection Act Clears Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources!

Feb 4, 2026

The U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee voted 11-9 on February 4, 2026, to advance the Historic Roadways Protection Act. But our work isn't done! The bill now heads to the full Senate floor and we need Senators to know this bill matters via the form below.

Historic Roadways Protection Act Clears Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

In a major victory for BRC supporters and public land access advocates, the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee voted 11-9 on February 4, 2026, to advance the Historic Roadways Protection Act (S.90).

This means the bill now moves to the Senate floor. While this is a huge win, there is still substantial work that needs to be done to see this legislation signed into law. First, we need the Senate Majority Leader, Senator John Thune, to understand the importance of this bill so it will be added to the legislative calendar. Senate leadership decides if and when this bill is heard on the Senate floor— as a stand alone bill or if it is packaged in a larger bill. We need everyone’s help to contact their U.S. Senators via the form below to let them know there is strong support for this legislation.

During the hearing this morning, Senator Lee, the sponsor of the Historic Roadways Protection Act, reiterated the significance of the historical value of the routes. But it’s important to understand this bill in and of itself does not decide whether these roads will be open or closed. The Act prohibits the BLM from finalizing or implementing certain travel management plans in Utah until ongoing R.S. 2477 lawsuits—disputes over public rights-of-way—are resolved by the courts. The Act would have influence on hundreds of miles of routes which were closed. It does not dictate whether roads stay open or closed but ensures agencies cannot preempt court decisions. We need to let the courts issue decisions before agencies unilaterally determine the status of historical routes. The process is currently backwards and this legislation rectifies that.

Community action is crucial: As this proves, your voice matters! Contact your U.S. Senators to express strong support and urge passage. Share this article with your network to amplify the pressure.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Rogue Judge Closes 2,200 Miles of OHV Routes in the Mojave Desert

Rogue Judge Closes 2,200 Miles of OHV Routes in the Mojave Desert

A recent federal court ruling has ordered sweeping closures of off-highway vehicle (OHV) routes and vast areas of public land in the Mojave Desert, using desert tortoise habitat as justification. The decision forces 2,200 miles of designated routes to close and places...

Categories