Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  –  Click Here

Silver City Travel Management in Southwest Idaho

Jan 19, 2024

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

This is the fourth travel management planning environmental assessment that has been released in the Owyhee’s area of Idaho within the past 6 months. Because of engagement of the motorized community, the alternatives presented reflect the need for motorized access. Comments until February 12, 2024. Fill in the information below to send a comment, and include your own personal experiences. You can read the full analysis of the plan below.

This travel area affects 818,000 acres and is the area of the towns of Homedale and Marsing. Alternative D will only permanently close 2% of routes which is one of the best plans we have seen proposed as they typically are proposing to close 50% of routes in travel areas. Seasonal closures are for sage grouse lekking and bald eagle nesting sites. However, many times recorded nests of wildlife are surrounding heavily traveled routes as we have recently seen in the Wyoming Rock Springs resource management plan. Therefore, this should not be a reason to close these routes permanently.

The BLM has stated in the environmental assessment, “motorized use tends to be moderate and related to access for livestock grazing, hunting, trapping, river floating, and motorized recreation.” Those uses have a right to continue using these routes. There are also many routes the BLM is considering a “user created route” and is not considering to officially add it into the trail system and recognizing it as a motorized route. These routes should be formally recognized and open for the public to use.

Through this plan, we would also like to see the BLM protect routes to dispersed camping sites, allow e-bikes and even consider new routes for e-bikes as there are not many non-motorized routes.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen a familiar coordinated push claiming that congressional action on the Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument (GSENM) management plan would be “undemocratic” and lead to “chaos.” This is the kind of push that usually feels more...

Categories