Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  –  Click Here

Oregon BLM Plan for 2.5 Million Acres Could Restrict OHV Access

Mar 18, 2026

The BLM is revising management plans for 2.5 million acres of western Oregon public lands, and without clear direction, motorized access could take a serious hit. BRC is pushing for an Enhanced Access Alternative to keep roads and trails open. Submit your comment to the BLM before March 23 and tell them access is non-negotiable.

Western Oregon BLM Plan
Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

The BLM is revising its Resource Management Plans (RMPs) for roughly 2.5 million acres of public lands across western Oregon. The Northwestern and Coastal Oregon Resource Management Plan and Southwestern Oregon Resource Management Plan will be amended in order to increase forest production and sustained yield.

These updated plans would replace the current 2016 management plans and guide how these lands are used for years to come. This is currently the scoping phase where the BLM is accepting comments guiding the process of this revision and nominations for new ACEC and future management of the planning area.

The proposal applies to BLM lands across western Oregon, including areas managed under the Oregon & California (O&C) Lands Act. These lands are some of the most productive timberlands in the country and are widely used for recreation, including motorized access. The Oregon & California (O&C) Lands Act of 1937 is a federal law that governs how certain public lands in western Oregon are managed.

Originally, these lands were granted to railroad companies to help build infrastructure, but after the companies failed to meet their obligations, the lands were returned to federal ownership. The O&C Act requires that these lands be managed for:

  • Permanent forest production (timber harvest)
  • Sustained yield (a continuous, renewable supply of timber)
  • Support for local counties, which receive a share of timber revenues

In short, the O&C Act establishes that these lands are meant to be actively managed working forests, not set aside exclusively for preservation.

Purpose of the Revision

According to the BLM, the purpose of this RMP revision is to:

Increase sustained yield of timber harvest to better align with historically higher production levels on O&C lands, while contributing to one of the principal uses identified in the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA)—meeting “the Nation’s need for domestic sources of timber and fiber.”

In short, the agency is looking to significantly increase timber production on these lands compared to current levels. This represents a potential major shift in how these lands are managed, with more emphasis on production and active use.

Why This Matters to BRC Members

For BlueRibbon Coalition members, this plan is also about access.

As timber production and forest management activities increase:

  • Road systems will be maintained, expanded, or reconfigured
  • Access decisions will directly impact motorized recreation
  • Travel management could either open or restrict opportunities

Without clear direction, increased management activity does not automatically mean increased public access. In fact, poorly designed plans can lead to more closures and restricted use. BlueRibbon Coalition is actively engaging in this process and advocating for an Enhanced Access Alternative.

To truly meet the stated purpose and need of this plan—and to comply with the intent of the EXPLORE Act—the BLM must:

  • Ensure robust, sustainable public access across these lands
  • Maintain and expand road and trail systems that support multiple uses
  • Recognize that active management requires active access

Increased access is not optional—it is essential. Access is the infrastructure that makes multiple-use management possible. Comments are accepted through March 23, 2026. Make your voice heard to the BLM using the form below.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen a familiar coordinated push claiming that congressional action on the Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument (GSENM) management plan would be “undemocratic” and lead to “chaos.” This is the kind of push that usually feels more...

Categories