Help Protect Outdoor Recreation Act for the Disabled

Nov 16, 2021

Categories: Uncategorized
Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Just about every time we’ve attended a ride organized for motorized recreation, there has been someone who suffers from a physical disability who chooses motorized recreation as their preferred way to access the public benefits of outdoor recreation on public land. From veteran groups providing therapy to the wounded and those suffering from PTSD, to retirees who have aged into a disability after spending a lifetime exploring their favorite places, to those who have been blindsided by accident or disease, and to those whose loved ones suffer from chronic lifelong mental and physical disability it is no surprise that an organization like BlueRibbon Coalition who fights for outdoor recreation for all would cross paths with the millions of Americans who choose motorized forms of outdoor recreation because these forms of recreation are their only choice.

In the 2001 case, Black Sands Beach v. Pool, BlueRibbon Coalition and other litigants challenged a BLM decision to prohibit motorized access to Black Sands Beach in Northern California. We were unsuccessful in these claims, and the current policy of the BLM and other federal agencies is that as long as they close areas to all motorized users they aren’t discriminating against those with disabilities. This unenlightened policy doesn’t capture the sentiment that we often hear from the disabled, that they do in fact feel discriminated against. The glaring blind spot of this policy is that it doesn’t recognize that areas closed to motorized use can be enjoyed by the able-bodied in almost all cases. The disabled find this to be discriminatory because it excludes them from receiving public benefits available to others but not to them solely because of their disability.

There is another case working its way through the court system by Rainer Huck that makes similar allegations of discrimination, and we are watching the case closely and are eager to see how it turns out. You can learn more about this case at http://saveourpubliclands.net. He is fighting the case pro se and could certainly use any help from the motorized recreation community.

However, as the number of disabled Americans continues to grow and the number of acres where motorized access is restricted continues to increase, it is time to finally reverse the systematic discrimination against those with disabilities that is entrenched in public land management agencies at all levels of government. Unfortunately, we can’t rely completely on the courts to deliver access justice to those who are discriminated against by restrictive land-use designations.

We have substantial plans in the works to correct this injustice, but there is an important opportunity happening right now that we shouldn’t ignore. At the beginning of his term, President Biden issued an Executive Order that focuses on addressing “entrenched disparities in our laws and public policies,” and mandates a “comprehensive approach to advancing equity for all, including people of color and others who have been historically underserved, marginalized and adversely affected by persistent poverty and inequality.” Americans with Disabilities are listed as a group that has been historically underserved and marginalized.

The Department of Interior is accepting public comment on how it should implement this Executive Order until Nov. 18th. Please make your voice heard to let the Secretary of the Interior know that road closures and motorized restrictions discriminate towards every American who is mobility impaired. Roads and trails on public lands are necessary to help uproot this pernicious form of discrimination. 

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Rogue Judge Closes 2,200 Miles of OHV Routes in the Mojave Desert

Rogue Judge Closes 2,200 Miles of OHV Routes in the Mojave Desert

A recent federal court ruling has ordered sweeping closures of off-highway vehicle (OHV) routes and vast areas of public land in the Mojave Desert, using desert tortoise habitat as justification. The decision forces 2,200 miles of designated routes to close and places...

Categories