Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  –  Click Here

Support Expanding Formal Coordination for all Federally Managed Public Land

Mar 5, 2025

Categories: Action Alert | BLM | USFS
Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Coordination is a formal process that requires federal land management agencies, such as the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), to work closely with state and local governments when making decisions that impact public lands. Unlike informal consultation or public comment periods, coordination mandates that federal agencies meaningfully consider and address the concerns and policies of local governments during the planning and decision-making processes.

Under various federal laws, including the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), coordination obligates federal agencies to engage directly with local governments to align federal land use plans with local policies wherever possible. This process involves sharing information, analyzing the impacts of proposed actions, and making genuine efforts to resolve conflicts between federal plans and local policies. The issue however, is coordination is only done with land use plans such as Resource Management Plans for the BLM and Land Management Plans for the Forest Service.

The primary goals of coordination are to enhance transparency, ensure that local communities have a substantial voice in decisions affecting their lands and resources, and reduce conflicts by addressing concerns early in the planning process. Effective coordination helps create balanced land management strategies that protect local interests, preserve access for recreation, and ensure sustainable resource use on federal public lands.

Coordination requirements need to be expanded for all federal land management, not just for large land use plans that happen once every few decades. Sign the petition below to support requirement that agencies coordinate with local governments for all federal land management.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen a familiar coordinated push claiming that congressional action on the Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument (GSENM) management plan would be “undemocratic” and lead to “chaos.” This is the kind of push that usually feels more...

Categories