Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  -  Click Here

Chumash Marine Sanctuary-Restricting more than meets the eye

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

October 24, 2023

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has proposed moving forward with designating the Chumash Marine Sanctuary in California. This sanctuary is being sold as a way to protect valuable ocean waters and species through this designation. From an organization that supports the proposal: "It is a source of food, jobs, medicine, spirituality, family memories, and the very air we breathe." What NOAA fails to recognize is the countless laws that already protect the water, air, wildlife and habitat. Comments are accepted until October 25, 2023. Groups aren't shy to admit this proposal is to further the 30X30 agenda. BRC has been watching and engaging on this fight from the beginning.

Because the boundaries of this area include the shoreline of Pismo Beach, we are also concerned that this designation could add additional restrictions to all forms of recreation in Oceano Dunes.

Alternative 4 encompasses the smallest area with 99 miles of coast and 4,476 square miles. BRC advocates for the no action alternative and to not designate the Chumash Marine Sanctuary. The following will be restricted:

  • producing oil, gas, or minerals
  • Discharging or depositing, from within or into the boundary of the Sanctuary, or from beyond the boundary of the Sanctuary, any material or other matter
  • feeding or attracting any bird, animal or sanctuary resource.
  • Operating Drones
  • Operating Vessels (boats, kayaks, etc.)

Matter is everything. Such a broad term can and will be used to restrict all forms of uses. Also this will be restricted within the boundary but also says "from beyond the boundary" meaning there is no real boundary in which restrictions will happen. The broad language used in the environmental impact statement is concerning for anyone who plans on coming within the area of the proposed sanctuary.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Categories