Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  –  Click Here

Protect Outdoor Recreation in Wyoming: Rock Springs RMP Amendment Proposal Open for Comment

Oct 9, 2025

Already home to numerous Wilderness Study Areas, the 2024 Rock Spring RMP designated new areas of critical environmental concern, limiting another 935,000 acres, which included the Killpecker sand dunes special recreation area. The BLM is now asking for feedback on current designations in the area. This is a critical opportunity to protect and expand outdoor recreation in Wyoming. Comments are due December 18, 2025.

Categories: Action Alert | BLM | Map | Wyoming
Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

UPDATE: The BLM has extended the deadline for comment through December 18, 2025. A public meeting has been scheduled for December 3, 2025 from 3-6 pm at the Sweetwater Events Complex at 3320 Yellowstone Road, in Rock Springs, Wyoming. 

In 2024, the BLM finalized the Rock Springs Resource Management Plan which governs how 3.6 million acres of land is managed. This plan designated 12 new areas of critical environmental concern (ACEC) that total 935,135 acres. It reduced the Killpecker sand dunes special recreation management area (SRMA), and other SRMA’s. The BLM has now opened scoping for an amendment to this RMP to re-evaluate 1.3 million acres of designations within this RMP including 13 Wilderness Study Areas.

When designations like ACECs or WSAs are added or tightened, certain uses such as motorized routes, trail development, facility construction, or access roads may become more constrained or prohibited. Over time, expanded or overly cautious designations can limit recreation, infrastructure maintenance, and other multiple-use activities. The BLM is asking for feedback on the current designations of ACES, WSA’s, SRMA’s and other management areas which you can see in the maps below.

Why the Recreation Community Must Submit Comments

  1. Defend on-the-ground access. Too often, designations are drawn broadly or sweepingly, resulting in trails, motor routes, or areas of interest being boxed out even where recreational use has existed for years.
  2. Ensure balanced management. Recreation is a lawful and important public land use. Comments help push BLM toward management plans that recognize recreation as a core use not as an afterthought.
  3. Prevent creeping closures. Once a designation is formally adopted, it is very difficult to undo or modify even if conditions change. Early input can help limit overreach.
  4. Shape the planning process. Agencies are legally obligated to consider and respond to public input in planning decisions. Comments that raise key issues such as access, economic impacts, and multiple-use tradeoffs force BLM to reckon with them.
  5. Support local economies. Outdoor recreation drives tourism, lodging, guiding, and services in many rural communities. Restrictive designations can weaken the economic base these communities rely on.

Comments are accepted through December 18, 2025.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen a familiar coordinated push claiming that congressional action on the Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument (GSENM) management plan would be “undemocratic” and lead to “chaos.” This is the kind of push that usually feels more...

Categories