Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  –  Click Here

5 Reasons to Halt the Dolores River Canyon National Monument

Dec 5, 2024

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

For years BlueRibbon Coalition has been working to oppose and prevent the designation of the proposed Dolores River Canyon National Monument in western Colorado. It will cause significant issues for public access to lands, the local economic stability, and responsible land management. Here are five key reasons why this designation is problematic and should be opposed:

1. Restriction of Public Access and Recreation
National monument designations often come with sweeping restrictions that limit traditional uses of public lands. For the Dolores River Canyon, this could mean closures to motorized recreation, dispersed camping, hunting, target shooting, and other activities vital to the rural lifestyle and recreation-based tourism. These restrictions disproportionately impact the local communities and recreation enthusiasts who depend on these lands for their livelihoods and enjoyment.

2. Threat to Local Economies
The Dolores River Canyon region supports ranching, resource development, and recreation-based businesses. Monument designations often impose regulations that hinder industries like grazing, mineral extraction, and timber harvesting, threatening local jobs and tax revenues. The economic impacts of these restrictions often ripple through small communities, undermining their sustainability.

3. Bureaucratic Overreach and Mismanagement
Federal monument designations frequently result in inefficient land management, as decision-making shifts away from local stakeholders to distant federal agencies. This can lead to mismanagement, as federal officials may lack the nuanced understanding of the region’s specific needs, cultural practices, and ecological realities. Local voices are often sidelined, despite having a vested interest in responsible stewardship of these lands.

4. Lack of Local Input and Transparency
Proposals like the Dolores River Canyon National Monument often emerge from political agendas rather than grassroots support. The process frequently overlooks, marginalizes, or dismisses input from local residents, recreational groups, and ranchers. This lack of transparency undermines trust and denies stakeholders a meaningful say in decisions that directly affect their lives and communities.

5. Existing Protections Are Already in Place
The Dolores River Canyon is already managed under a variety of federal and state protections designed to conserve its natural and cultural values. These include Wilderness Study Areas (WSAs), Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs), and other conservation measures. Layering additional monument designations on top of these protections is redundant and risks overregulating the area, making it inaccessible for responsible and sustainable use.


Take Action

Protecting the Dolores River Canyon should not come at the cost of access, livelihoods, and local autonomy. We urge you to speak out against this designation by contacting your representatives below!

Map of Proposed Designation

Featured image courtesy of Trails Offroad

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen a familiar coordinated push claiming that congressional action on the Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument (GSENM) management plan would be “undemocratic” and lead to “chaos.” This is the kind of push that usually feels more...

Categories