Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  –  Click Here

12 Days of Legal Updates: Day 7 National Monument Challenge in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals

Dec 12, 2023

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

In August 2022, BlueRibbon Coalition filed a challenge to President Biden’s expansion of the Bears Ears National Monument and Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument in Utah’s District Court. 

This year we moved forward with this challenge, and we are currently scheduled for this challenge to be heard in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. We are partners with the state of Utah in the challenge.

The heart of our challenge is that when presidents designate national monuments that are millions of acres in size, they are abusing the limited powers granted to presidents by the Antiquities Act. With massive new monuments designated in Nevada and Arizona since we filed our challenge, it is clear that we will continue to see presidents continue to abuse the Antiquities Act to lock up our public lands.

Our concerns with these expansive monuments were validated this fall when the Bureau of Land Management released management plans for the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument. Some of these proposals were the most restrictive plans we’ve seen, and the public should be prepared to see significant loss of public access to these areas.

This is why we’re fighting so hard to challenges these monuments!

In November we learned that Manhattan Institute, the Reason Foundation, the Arizona Senate President, the Arizona House Speaker, Senators Cruz and Lee, the Pacific Legal Foundation, and the American Forest Resource Council filed amicus briefs in support of our appeal.

The states of Idaho, Alaska, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming also filed amicus briefs.

In the meantime, there are discussions happening to build support for three new monuments in California. If you’re fed up with the government locking up our lands, we encourage our members and supporters to oppose these monuments.

>> Oppose New Monuments <<

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen a familiar coordinated push claiming that congressional action on the Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument (GSENM) management plan would be “undemocratic” and lead to “chaos.” This is the kind of push that usually feels more...

Categories