Save Moab – Win a Custom GasGas Dirt Bike + VIP Trip to Moab – Click Here

NOAA Proposing to Designate Chumash Heritage National Marine Sanctuary: One more federal government layer to restrict use

Jan 8, 2022

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

UPDATE- The comment period has been extended until January 31st. The National Marine Sanctuary Act grants permission to the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration NOAA to designate national marine sanctuaries.

The Northern Chumash Council, which is not a registered tribe but a nonprofit corporation, has proposed to NOAA to designate 7,670 square miles of ocean and 156 miles of coastline as sanctuary. Conservation groups are claiming we need to listen to the tribes and their expertise. First, this is not a registered tribe, second the Chumash Tribe, not the Northern Chumash Council, has used this area for years for recreation purposes including fishing. All of these activities will be restricted under this sanctuary designation.

Public comments are accepted until January 10th and there are many conservation groups flooding NOAA with comments in support of the designation. This designation has been proposed in the past and because of broad range opposition it has not been successful. Below is the rejection letter from 2015. This is why submitting comments, sharing with others and including in your comment your interest in this area is so crucial.

Adequate studies have not been conducted to ensure this designation will protect what NOAA claims it will protect and to show the effects it will have on the economy. We know this will greatly hinder the tourism industry and NOAA needs to be held accountable for the financial loss that will occur as a result of the designation. BlueRibbon is also concerned with the lack of public involvement. It seems as only the Northern Chumash Council and conservation groups have had a place at the table during this planning process.

As we often see with the Antiquities Act, this is a complete abuse of power and conservation groups are working to lock up and restrict access to an egregious amount of land and water. This area is already protected under many layers such as the Endangered Species Act and many federal regulations for commercial fishing and recreation. This sanctuary would be located in between two other previously designated marine sanctuaries, the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary to the north and the Channel Islands Sanctuary to the south. On December 15, 2021 the state of California released a draft for Pathways to Achieve 30 X 30 you can read the draft and provide comment here. We are concerned NOAA will use this designation as a way to achieve the drafts goal of 30 X 30.

Submit comments on the Marine Sanctuary by January 31st.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Outdoor Americans with Disabilities Act Re-introduced in Congress

Outdoor Americans with Disabilities Act Re-introduced in Congress

This week legislation was introduced in the United States Senate that would guarantee motorized access to our public lands for Americans with disabilities. Senators Mike Lee (R-UT) and John Curtis (R-UT) have just introduced the Outdoor Americans With...

Categories