Win a Bakcou Scout E-Bike + Utility Trailer – Click Here

E-bike Use on Forest Service Lands in Arkansas

Aug 22, 2022

Categories: Action Alert | Arkansas | Mountain Biking | Uncategorized
Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

With electric bikes continuing to grow in popularity, the Forest Service in Arkansas is looking to adapt definitions and rules regarding e-bikes on Forest Service lands. Between 2019 and 2020 e-bike sales increased 190%. There is a huge new user group on public lands and these users should be accommodated rather than restricted. In several cases we have seen land agencies across the nation look to restrict e-bike use on mountain bike trails. If the concern is impact, BRC advocates that an e-bike has the same impact as a human powered mountain bike. Electric bikes don’t increase impact, they simply allow more people to access some of the most remote and beautiful lands throughout the country.

Join Us to Increase Recreation Access for the Disabled

Another proposal we have seen regarding e-bikes is to restrict certain classes of electric bicycles. Currently there are three classes however, new technology is allowing e-bike users to change the classification of their e-bike with a relatively simple modification. With e-bike use being so new and technology evolving every day it would be unwise for the Forest Service and other land agencies to adopt definitions that would prohibit or restrict e-bike use when those definitions could be obsolete in the near future depending on new technology.

This proposal is for the Caddo Ranger District, Mena Ranger District, Oden Ranger District, Womble Ranger District, Sylamore Ranger District and Buffalo Ranger Districts and would primarily affect Buffalo Bike Trails, Syllamo Bike Trails, and Womble Trails. The National Forest is looking to create a definition of e-bikes that would classify them as a motor vehicle, establish new criteria when designating areas for e-bikes that aren’t currently open to motorized vehicles, and create new definitions for bicycles and e-bikes and all classes of e-bikes.

BRC would like to see e-bike access continued on motorized and non-motorized trails where mountain bikes are currently allowed. Because impact is the same as a human powered bicycle the FS should not be restricting use on roads, trails and areas simply because it is an e-bike.

Add your voice to ours to protect e-bike use in Arkansas by using the tool below to send in a comment. Feel free to add in your own personal language to the letter.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Tax-Deductible Donation
Latest Articles
Support the Grand Reopening of our Off-Road Trails in Moab

Support the Grand Reopening of our Off-Road Trails in Moab

Sep 24, 2025

The Bureau of Land Management has released a proposal to reassess to re-open routes in the Labyrinth Rims/Gemini Bridges Travel Management Plan. This plan was originally finalized in 2023 and closed 317 miles of popular off-road routes. BRC filed a lawsuit in federal...

Will Santa Barbara Be the Next Palisades?

Will Santa Barbara Be the Next Palisades?

Sep 19, 2025

The biggest fear tactic we have seen in the discourse around the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule is to suggest that rescinding the rule will lead to logging companies coming in and clearcutting our forests. Long before the Roadless Rule was enacted the USFS...

More Articles »

Categories