Win a $74k+ Custom Side-by-Side & Trailer Package  –  Click Here

Support the Plan to Sustain Lake Powell and Lake Mead

Nov 9, 2023

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.
We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Why you should submit here, even if you already have elsewhere!

We keep them honest. If everyone only comments through the government/agency site, we have to take their word on how many comments were received. By submitting through BRC, we create an independent record of our community’s response that can’t be buried or under-reported.

We protect your voice. If this fight ends up in court, having our own record of submitted comments means we don’t have to wait a year or more for a government agency to turn over documents. We can move quickly with proof that thousands of you spoke up.

We keep you in the loop. When you comment through our site, we can send you updates on what comes next. If you only use the government/agency site, you’re depending on them to tell you what happens next — and they won’t.

Double coverage matters. Even if you’ve already commented through the government/agency site, submitting through ours makes your voice count twice — once in their system, and once in ours. That way they know the OHV community is watching and tracking every move.

For years, BRC has been trusted to run action alerts like this. Thousands of members and supporters have used this system effectively to defend access to public lands. This isn’t about collecting your info — it’s about building the strongest, most transparent record possible to hold agencies accountable.

Bureau of Reclamation is accepting public comment for the near term Colorado River Operations. In April of 2023 BOR released its original alternatives and the public provided feedback. Many of our members sent in comments. The BOR ended that public comment period due to the Arizona, Nevada, and California agreeing to work on a solution together. Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, and New Mexico, requested BOR analyze this proposal which would reduce lower basin uses by 3 million acre feet.

BOR has adopted this lower basin proposal as the second alternative and the preferred action to a no action alternative. This analysis and operational plan will guide BOR for the next few years before the Post-2026 Operating Guidelines are finalized. comments are due December 11, 2023. Enter in your information below to send a comment to BOR supporting operating guidelines that sustain Lake Powell and Lake Mead.

The risk of levels in both Lake Powell and Lake Mead have been substantially reduced thanks to the previous winter the Colorado Basin had. Lower basin states have agreed to cut 3 million acre feet of water consumption.

“As a result of the commitment to record volumes of conservation in the Basin and recent hydrology, the chance of falling below critical elevations was reduced to eight percent at Lake Powell and four percent at Lake Mead through 2026”. The lower division proposal will conserve nearly 400,000 acre feet through 2025 in Lake Mead.

The tables below show the two plans in comparison. The preferred, proposal will basically allow standard releases when Lake Powell has an elevation above 3575 that will balance water storage between Lake Powell and Lake Mead. If Lake Powell drops below 3575, the amount released will increase if water levels in Lake Mead are lower than 1025. If there is a projection that Lake Powell could reach an elevation level of 3500′ then cutbacks would kick in. The Bureau of Reclamation reserves the right to protect the Colorado River System if levels at Lake Powell drop below 3500′. (At the time of this writing, Lake Powell is at 3572′, and Lake Mead is at 1064′).

This management approach is consistent in principle with what we proposed in our Path to 3588′ Plan. The biggest difference is we would have had the Mid-Elevation Release Tier be triggered when the lake reaches 3588′ in elevation instead of 3575′. The prior trigger was 3525′ in the recent years when water levels were dangerously low. We are supportive of a management approach that raises the elevation levels of these tiers to trigger cutbacks before we get close to a danger zone. We also support the BOR’s commitment to protecting both reservoirs instead of analyzing any of the plans that would propose to drain Lake Powell and decommission the Glen Canyon Dam.

Revised Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Near-term Colorado River Operations Summary:

The release tiers are based off a 24 months study, BOR should use more than a 2 year average. these releases are also subjected to a mid-year review so the releases could be changed if predictions seem to be innaccurate at the mid year point.

  • If the April 24-Month Study projects the end-of-water-year elevation to be at or above 3,575 feet, an adjustment would be made to release 8.23 maf from Lake Powell.
  • If the April 24-Month Study projects the end-of-water-year elevation to be below 3,575 feet and at or above 3,550 feet, an adjustment would be made to release 7.48 maf from Lake Powell.
  • If the April 24-Month Study projects the end-of-water-year elevation to be below 3,550 feet and at or above 3,525 feet, an adjustment would be made to release 7.0 maf from Lake Powell.
  • If the April 24-Month Study projects the end-of-water-year elevation to be below 3,525 feet and at or above 3,500 feet, the release of 6.0 maf from Lake Powell would be maintained.
  • If the April 24-Month Study projects the end-of-water-year elevation to be below 3,500 feet, the dam would be operated to maintain an elevation of at least 3,500 feet. Additionally, up to 6.0 maf would be released over the year with a goal of maintaining LTEMP minimum flows, subject to run-of-the-river conditions, operational constraints, and prudent operations as determined by Reclamation.

Appreciate What We Do?

It takes a team of people to investigate, review, advocate and litigate in order to protect your rights to public lands. Please consider donating today so we can defend your ground.

Latest Articles
Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA: What Critics Are Getting Wrong

Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen a familiar coordinated push claiming that congressional action on the Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument (GSENM) management plan would be “undemocratic” and lead to “chaos.” This is the kind of push that usually feels more...

Categories